"Stanglin is descriptive without overtly desiring to adjudge orthodoxy, displaying an expert and precise ability to define complex scholastic forms of argument customary in academic discourse. [...] Stanglin writes well and his topic is worthy. His book should be used in Reformation studies in general and in courses that examine the developments of seventeenth-century Reformed theology in particular."
Jeremy J. Bangs, Leiden American Pilgrim Museum, Church History: Studies in Christianity and Culture, Vol. 77, No. 4 (December 2008).

“Stanglin’s study is crisp, sympathetic, close to the primary texts and highly convincing.”
Stephen Hampton, Peterhouse, Cambridge. In: The Journal of Ecclesiastical History, Vol. 59, No. 4 (2008).

“This well-focused study … is a highly useful contribution to our understanding of the history of Reformed scholasticism.”
Arnoud Visser, Utrecht University. In: Renaissance Quarterly, Vol. 61, No. 1 (Spring 2008).

“Keith Stanglin's thorough and substantive analysis is a welcome reprieve from cursory and superficial conversations about "Arminianism."
John Mark Hicks, Lipscomb University. In: Restoration Quarterly.

“This is a fascinating and detailed study of some of the essentials of Arminius’s thought.”
Linda Gottschalk-Stuckrath, Leiden. In: Church History and Religious Culture, Vol. 87, No. 3 (2007).

“This excellent monograph is now the place to begin for English-language readers seeking a scholarly treatment of Arminius on salvation.”
Douglas A. Sweeney Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. In: Trinity Journal.

“To understand Arminius on salvation or, more generally, Reformed theology at Leiden during this period, this is the best resource available”.
Thomas H. McCall, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. In: ThemeliosVol. 35, No. 1 (April 2010).