"This important study, based on Moule’s doctoral dissertation, both builds on Thijssen’s earlier work on academic censure in Paris and modifies some of its conclusions, particularly with regard to the role of fraternal correction in the process. Moule guides the reader expertly through the extensive body of ecclesiastical legislation and commentary on capitular and, by extension, faculty jurisdiction; his argument for the importance of the cathedral chapter as a model for the faculty’s jurisdictional authority is particularly well made. While obviously of most relevance to medievalists, the work will also be of interest to scholars of the early modern period, as it provides valuable background to the role of the faculty in the sixteenth century, when it functioned as an arbiter of orthodoxy not just for its own members, but for the kingdom of France as a whole." - Mark Taplin, in: Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 69/2, (April 2018), pp. 393-394
''Moule’s thorough, detailed, and meticulous work highlights several important aspects of academic censure in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. [...] By moving away from a purely theological view of academic censure and illuminating its legal context, Moule’s study provides new perspectives and makes an important contribution to the study of academic heresy''. - Justine L. Trombley, in: Catholic Review (Spring 2019)