"[An] important book that should be read by students of urban politics and planning."—Political Science Quarterly

"This is an important book. . . . Lewis and Neiman draw upon but move beyond existing theories of urban policymaking, leadership, and representation . . . and make a major contribution to the field of urban politics and to our understanding of the way urban government works."—Harold L. Wolman, director, George Washington Institute of Public Policy

"A careful, thoughtful, balanced, timely, well-written analysis of growth politics and policy in California cities. The results provide readers with a rich and nuanced portrait of the development policies pursued by various types of cities."—Elisabeth Gerber, University of Michigan

"Custodians of Place lays out an innovative framework for understanding city land use and development decisions."—Richard C. Feiock, Augustus B. Turnbull Professor of Public Administration, Askew School of Public Administration and Policy, Florida State University

"Analytically crisp and well researched, Custodians of Place is a major contribution to the literature on urban development policy. The authors convincingly show how the future (vision) and the past (community history) shape how city officials make all-important land use and development decisions. This is must reading both for urban scholars and practitioners."—Steven Erie, University of California, San Diego

"Lewis and Neiman's conceptualization of urban development politics reaches a higher level of abstraction than previous work. The authors do not throw away existing theory, but instead offer the more generalized concept of 'contingent trusteeship' thus allowing for the shading and hues of local governance to be recognized and examined. This book is a valuable read and an important resource for students of urban politics and planning."—Victoria Basolo, University of California, Irvine and editor, Journal of Urban Affairs

"Lewis and Neiman move our understanding of local development policy forward by positing a more complex model of local policymaking that goes beyond the constraining effects of local economic imperatives. Not only do politics 'count' in local development, but Lewis and Neiman provide a compelling framework for understanding how."—Edward G. Goetz, director, Urban and Regional Planning Program, Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota